Review



exome sequencing wes data  (Broad Clinical Labs)


Bioz Verified Symbol Broad Clinical Labs is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Broad Clinical Labs manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 95
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Broad Clinical Labs exome sequencing wes data
    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After <t>whole-exome</t> <t>sequencing,</t> PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).
    Exome Sequencing Wes Data, supplied by Broad Clinical Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 297 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exome+sequencing+wes+data/pmc12802574-231-9-16?v=Broad+Clinical+Labs
    Average 95 stars, based on 297 article reviews
    exome sequencing wes data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Detection of heterogeneous resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors from cell-free DNA"

    Article Title: Detection of heterogeneous resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors from cell-free DNA

    Journal: Cell Genomics

    doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100987

    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After whole-exome sequencing, PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After whole-exome sequencing, PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).

    Techniques Used: Sequencing, Clone Assay, Functional Assay, Protein-Protein interactions, Comparison, Mutagenesis



    Similar Products

    exome sequencing wes data  (Broad Clinical Labs)
    95
    Broad Clinical Labs exome sequencing wes data
    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After <t>whole-exome</t> <t>sequencing,</t> PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).
    Exome Sequencing Wes Data, supplied by Broad Clinical Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exome+sequencing+wes+data/pmc12802574-231-9-16?v=Broad+Clinical+Labs
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    exome sequencing wes data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    whole exome sequencing wes data  (Blueprint Genetics)
    86
    Blueprint Genetics whole exome sequencing wes data
    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After <t>whole-exome</t> <t>sequencing,</t> PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).
    Whole Exome Sequencing Wes Data, supplied by Blueprint Genetics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exome+sequencing+wes+data/pm42123284-73-7-30?v=Blueprint+Genetics
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    whole exome sequencing wes data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    whole exome sequence (wes) data  (Federation of European Neuroscience Societies)
    90
    Federation of European Neuroscience Societies whole exome sequence (wes) data
    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After <t>whole-exome</t> <t>sequencing,</t> PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).
    Whole Exome Sequence (Wes) Data, supplied by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exome+sequencing+wes+data/pm40504793-291-0-22?v=Federation+of+European+Neuroscience+Societies
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    whole exome sequence (wes) data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    whole exome sequencing (wes) somatic mutation data  (Illumina Inc)
    90
    Illumina Inc whole exome sequencing (wes) somatic mutation data
    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After <t>whole-exome</t> <t>sequencing,</t> PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).
    Whole Exome Sequencing (Wes) Somatic Mutation Data, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exome+sequencing+wes+data/pm40155623-508-20-12?v=Illumina+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    whole exome sequencing (wes) somatic mutation data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    whole exome sequencing wes data  (DSMZ)
    95
    DSMZ whole exome sequencing wes data
    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After <t>whole-exome</t> <t>sequencing,</t> PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).
    Whole Exome Sequencing Wes Data, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exome+sequencing+wes+data/pmc11513324-51-0-15?v=DSMZ
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    whole exome sequencing wes data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    whole exome sequencing  (Broad Clinical Labs)
    95
    Broad Clinical Labs whole exome sequencing
    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After <t>whole-exome</t> <t>sequencing,</t> PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).
    Whole Exome Sequencing, supplied by Broad Clinical Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exome+sequencing+wes+data/custom%40whole-exome-sequencing%4037721535?v=Broad+Clinical+Labs
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    whole exome sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    whole-exome sequencing (wes) data  (Illumina Inc)
    90
    Illumina Inc whole-exome sequencing (wes) data
    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After <t>whole-exome</t> <t>sequencing,</t> PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).
    Whole Exome Sequencing (Wes) Data, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exome+sequencing+wes+data/pm38058155-43-12-32?v=Illumina+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    whole-exome sequencing (wes) data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After whole-exome sequencing, PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).

    Journal: Cell Genomics

    Article Title: Detection of heterogeneous resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors from cell-free DNA

    doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100987

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Study design for patient cohorts and genomic analyses (A) Initial study criteria with study design based on sample availability and treatment timing. After whole-exome sequencing, PhylogicNDT and SignatureAnalyzer were used to identify clones and compare mutational signatures, respectively. Functional mutations were characterized based on existing evidence previously published or annotated in genomic databases, such as COSMIC, ClinVar, and OncoKB. (B) Signaling pathway landscape for paired-cohort participants ( n = 26) organized by time on tyrosine kinase treatment (days by sampled TKI) and acquired ( n = 8) or intrinsic ( n = 18) resistance. Known mechanisms in ERBB2 and PIK3CA are highlighted. Signaling pathways are depicted in decreasing frequency per number of mutations for the entire cohort of paired participants. Arrows indicate the subclonal trajectory as either growing, stable, or shrinking. The TP53 and ESR1+ regulator pathways were significantly mutated ( q < 0.05; MutSig, Fisher’s method). Stacked bar charts indicate relative contributions of mutational signatures identified by SignatureAnalyzer to the mutational spectrum of each participant. (C) Pathway-level comparison of mutation frequency between four cohorts: intrinsic ( n = 18), acquired ( n = 8), pre-TKI ( n = 55), and post-TKI ( n = 30). Pathways were included if they possessed at least one mutation. There were no significant differences in pathway-level mutation frequency between cohorts (Fisher’s exact test).

    Article Snippet: The remainder of our genomic analysis relied on whole exome sequencing (WES) data generated by the Broad Institute Genomics Platform.

    Techniques: Sequencing, Clone Assay, Functional Assay, Protein-Protein interactions, Comparison, Mutagenesis